With rapid technological advancements, integrating digital solutions into critical infrastructure has been transformative. The rise of Operational Technology (OT) security has enhanced efficiency, enabled predictive maintenance, and facilitated real-time monitoring across industries. However, as OT systems become more interconnected and accessible, the need for robust OT security has never been more pressing.
In this blog, we explore the operational technology landscape, uncover its security vulnerabilities, and discuss the importance of Privileged Access Management (PAM) as a critical layer of defence, among other key aspects.
Operational Technology, often called the “industrial internet,” encompasses the hardware and software used to control and monitor physical devices, processes, and events. From power plants and manufacturing facilities to transportation systems and smart cities, OT technology ensures the smooth operation of critical infrastructure. This technology enables industries to collect and analyse data in real-time, resulting in improved decision-making and optimized performance.
OT technology bridges the digital and physical worlds. It includes systems such as Industrial Control Systems (ICS), Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), and Distributed Control Systems (DCS). These systems work together to manage industrial processes, monitor equipment, and maintain operational efficiency.
This surge in innovation has posed many challenges, particularly in the security realm.
The vulnerabilities of OT technology are increasing, making it an attractive target for threat actors. Considering the importance of industrial process continuity, the value of trade secrets, and the potential public safety impacts of compromising critical infrastructure (CI), it’s no surprise that cyber attackers view industrial organizations as prime targets for espionage, financial gain, or cyberwarfare.
On April 10, 2022, the PSU major Oil India Limited suffered a cyberattack that disrupted its operations in Assam, India. OIL received a ransom demand of USD 75,00,000 (over INR 57 crore) from the perpetrator.
The cyberattack occurred on one of OIL’s workstations in the Geological and Reservoir department, as the server, network, and clients’ PCs experienced a network outage.
On April 29, 2021, the Colonial Pipeline, a U.S. oil pipeline network that originated in Houston, Texas, primarily responsible for transporting gasoline and jet fuel to the Southeastern region of the United States, fell victim to a ransomware attack.
The FBI attributed the attacks to the DarkSide hacking group. It was disclosed that hackers gained unauthorised access to Colonial Pipeline Co.’s networks by exploiting a virtual private network (VPN) account.
In response to this cyber threat, Colonial Pipeline Company suspended all pipeline operations, leading to significant disruptions for customers along the East Coast and airlines.
Given how critical service disruption on a large scale can be, OT security must be a top priority. But before we delve into the challenges pertaining to OT security (and how to deal with them),
OT security prioritises safety over confidentiality, protecting physical assets, machinery, and personnel. Cyber attackers targeting OT aim to cause physical disruptions, whereas IT hackers seek valuable information. In OT, unauthorised access often occurs through vulnerable equipment, bypassing security.
For instance, a water bottling plant’s disruption could result in contaminated water reaching consumers, with severe consequences. Ultimately, OT security ensures operational continuity, while IT security protects data integrity and privacy.
A Comparison Between IT and OT Security
Aspect | Operational Technology (OT) | Information Technology (IT) |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Manages physical processes and operations (e.g., machinery, sensors). | Handles data processing and communication (e.g., servers, computers). |
Primary Concern | Safety and continuous operation of industrial systems. | Confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. |
Security Focus | Protects physical assets and ensures operational continuity. | Protects data from unauthorised access and corruption. |
Network Design | Often uses isolated, legacy systems with limited connectivity. | Connected, digital systems with high interactivity. |
Vulnerability | Targeted by cyberattacks for physical damage or disruption. | Targeted for data breaches, malware, and ransomware attacks. |
Response Time | Requires immediate response to prevent safety hazards or operational downtime. | May allow more time for response and recovery. |
Threat Landscape | Focuses on attacks that disrupt physical operations (e.g., ransomware targeting SCADA systems). | Focuses on data-driven attacks (e.g., phishing, DDoS). |
Regulatory Standards | Subject to industry-specific regulations (e.g., NIST, IEC 62443). | Governed by broader IT standards (e.g., GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001). |
Security Measures | Often physical security controls alongside cybersecurity (e.g., air-gapping). | It relies more on firewalls, encryption, and access controls. |
Updates & Patching | Difficult due to legacy systems, often requiring more manual oversight. | More frequent updates and patches, with automated tools. |
So, then the question arises: what’s the solution to all this?
Amid the need for specialised measures for OT security, PAM emerges as a viable solution.
Here’s how PAM solutions enable the fine-tuning of user access and privileges. They offer granular access control, allowing administrators to define and enforce specific permissions for each user or group. This helps ensure that only authorised individuals can access critical systems and resources.
And lastly,
Also Read: How does Privileged Access Management help the manufacturing industry?