Sectona at Infosecurity Europe 2025 | June 3–5 | ExCeL London
Stop by our booth (Stand C 95) for live demo of Sectona’s Modern Infrastructure Access Platform
Think Your Security Is Strong? A User Access Review Might Reveal a Different Story
When it comes to privileged accounts, one question always stands out – how can organisations ensure that the right people have the right access at the right time?
The answer lies in effective privileged access management (PAM) and more importantly, regular privileged user access reviews.
The stakes are high. Credential theft incidents are among the costliest security breaches, averaging $779,707 per incident, while malicious insider events cost organisations an average of $715,366 per incident. These figures highlight why controlling and monitoring privileged access is a critical component of any organisation’s security strategy.
Regular privileged user access reviews are far more than a compliance checkbox. They play a critical role in reducing insider threats, improving visibility into access rights, identifying excessive privileges, and ensuring that users retain only the access they genuinely need. When done effectively, access reviews strengthen security while helping organisations operate efficiently and with confidence.
In this blog, we’ll explore what privileged user access reviews are, why they matter, the common challenges organisations face when conducting them, and the best practices for making them more effective. We’ll also walk through a step-by-step process for conducting a successful privileged user access review.
What Is a User Access Review?
A user access review is a systematic process of evaluating and verifying which system, data, and applications each user can access in the organisation. It ensures that access permissions are aligned with the user’s current role and responsibilities. In simple terms, it ensures that users have access only to the systems, applications, and data required for their job responsibilities. It helps reduce security risks, prevent privileged creep, and maintain compliance with regulatory requirements.
These users usually have elevated access, allowing them to interact with critical systems, sensitive data, and key applications. When it comes to privileged users, it includes:
- IT administrators who can create new accounts and manage passwords.
- Finance system managers who must approve high-value transactions or payments.
- DevOps engineers who can deploy the code directly to production systems.
While these roles are essential to business operations, unmanaged privileged access significantly increases the risk of unauthorised activity, data exposure, and operational disruption.
Research indicates that 45% of security incidents involve overprivileged internal users. When you conduct regular privileged user access reviews, you can verify whether each privileged account is justified, ensure that entitlements are still relevant to the user’s current position and role in the organisation, and revoke unnecessary or excessive permissions quickly.
Why Is User Access Review Necessary?
Organisations nowadays operate in complex hybrid environments that consist of on-premises infrastructure, cloud applications, remote workforces, and third-party integrations. For organisations, handling and managing privileged access across these environments becomes very challenging.
Mitigating Security Risks through Frequent Review
Frequent user access review is a crucial defence against the emerging security threats. When an employee changes roles or departments, their accumulated permissions can create significant vulnerabilities through privilege creep.
Organisations should implement a systematic review process to identify and revoke any unnecessary access rights before they can harm or create security incidents that lead to financial or reputational damage.
Benefits of User Access Review
Through a systematic review, you can proactively detect dormant accounts and unnecessary privileges before they can create vulnerability. Here are a few user access review benefits:
- Enhanced visibility
- Better compliance readiness
- Reduced risk of privilege creep
- Increased accountability
- Stronger governance
The Challenges of User Access Review
Despite their importance, many organisations face difficulties while conducting access reviews, such as:
- Large volume of accounts
- Lack of visibility
- Manual process
- Review fatigue
- Inconsistent policies
- Limited audit trails
Also Read: How Privileged Access Management (PAM) Outsmarts Credential Stuffing Attacks
Step-by-Step User Access Review Process Checklist
Every organisation has unique needs for data security; therefore, you need something different from the norm. You can use these steps as a foundation and add controls as necessary for regulatory compliance or industry-specific risks.
1. System Mapping and Planning:
Map your system, define the extent of your organisation’s user access review responsibilities, and identify all data assets and network resources. This will help you detect potential vulnerabilities or flaws that need protection, such as privilege escalation exploits.
Organisations should:
- Identify critical business systems and applications
- Map users to systems and resources they can access
- Document ownership of each application and system
- Establish dependencies between systems and privileged accounts
Comprehensive system mapping provides the foundation for accurate and effective access reviews.
2. Access Control Inventory
The next step in the user review access process is often the most time-consuming and resource-intensive, yet it delivers the greatest impact. When you create a user access inventory, you make a list of the following:
- Administrator accounts
- Service accounts
- Shared privileged accounts
- Emergency access accounts
- Cloud privilege identities
- Permissions
- Login history
- Start and end dates
Over time, this database evolves and remain up-to date as employees leave the organisations or you change your systems. The goal is to make it easy to quickly see who has access to what and how they have used the permissions.
3. Program Management
Develop a formal user access review program that defines governance, responsibilities, review frequency, and escalation procedure. After that, you need to decide who will be responsible for this user access review program. For example, in enterprises, this is usually the CISO or your compliance team, and if your organisation falls under HIPAA, then the security officer should oversee the user access review process.
Usually, program leads assign some responsibilities to the IT teams, as they have more experience detecting access control flaws in technical setup, and compliance officers understand the impact of privacy regulations.
4. Role-Based Access Control
Before you start reviews, you need a structured framework that defines your organisation’s approach to access control. You can establish role-based profiles that fulfils the requirement of different job positions’ network access. For example, IT technicians don’t need financial department access. Additionally, only a few high-level positions in each department should have permissions to install applications, delete files, or change settings.
5. Standardised User Access Review Procedure
Make sure that your user access review process follows the formal policies and procedures. Senior management should approve review procedures, audit frequency, risk guidelines assessment, and documentation standards.
6. User Access Review Assessment
When performing the user access review, the senior management needs to review access rights in the key areas, such as:
- Data permissions
- Privileges
- Departments
- Discrepancies
- Dormant accounts
- Logs
You need to be very specific and thorough while evaluating admin-level permissions. Those accounts that have editorial access should have higher-than-normal security protections.
7. Access Modifications
You should make changes according to the assessment that will comply with your policies, best practices for cyber security, and regulatory requirements. As the saying goes, it’s better to be cautious than to be sorry. You should limit the access instead of granting too much, as you can always grant access if the situation requires.
8. Documentation
Always make sure you have a record of all review outcomes and conclusions. Keep a track of all the changes that have been made, any warning signs to keep in check and special areas of focus for future reviews.
9. Automation
Although nothing can beat human touch, having digital tools handy can help you improve your results. For example, cybersecurity software can instantly flag attempts to modify access or permissions. You can also use automation to send reminders or trigger alerts, such as wrong passwords, termination of employees, or unauthorised access. These alerts can help IT team to remove credentials or take appropriate actions in any other situations.
Also Read: Privileged User Activity Monitoring for Better Visibility
Simplifying and Securing Privileged User Access Reviews with Sectona
Managing privileged access reviews manually can be resource-intensive and error-prone. Organisations need a centralised approach that provides visibility, automation, and governance across the entire privileged access lifecycle. Sectona helps organisations streamline user access reviews through the PAM platform.
Here are a few key features you can use for user access review:
- Role-Based Access Governance
With Sectona, you can strengthen oversite with privileged access governance that enforces separation of duties and responsibilities, defines who can access what, when, and for what duration, and align with frameworks like NIST, ISO, and CIS.
- Audit Ready Reporting
Sectona delivers detailed, audit-ready reports that provide complete visibility into user review activities, privileged account usage, access approvals, and remediation actions. These reports simplify audit preparation and help organisations demonstrate adherence to internal security policies and regulatory requirements.
- Compliance Support
Organisations operating under frameworks such as ISO 27001, HIPAA, RBI, SOX, SAMA, PCI DSS, and GDPR should regularly review and validate privileged access. Sectona helps streamline compliance efforts by providing centralised access governance, review workflows, auditing and monitoring capabilities, and comprehensive reporting that supports regulatory and audit requirements.
- Session Monitoring
Sectona enables organisations to monitor, record, and audit privileged sessions across RDP, SSH, SQL, and web-based environments, providing greater visibility and control over privileged activities. You can monitor, record, and audit each and every activity with tamper-proof video, command logs, real-time oversight, keystroke tracking, and instant session termination if any anomalies are detected.
The Future of Privileged Security Lies in Threat Detection
As organisations continue to expand their digital environments, regularly validating privileged access becomes a necessity for minimising security risks, maintaining compliance, and enforcing least privileged principles. However, the manual review process often struggles to keep pace with modern IT complexity. Organisations require automated, scalable, and audit-ready solutions to effectively manage user access for privileged accounts.
With Sectona’s PAM platform, organisations can simplify user access reviews, improve governance, accelerate compliance efforts, and ensure that privileged access remains secure, controlled, and aligned with their requirements.
Please feel free to contact us or request a demo. We would be happy to assist you.
Recent Posts
